HHS asks Supreme Court for more time in filing response to site neutral payment review

The Office of Wellness and Human Companies has requested the Supreme Court docket for an extension to file a reaction to the American Hospital Association’s request for a judicial review about web-site neutral payments.

The govt reaction was owing by March fifteen, but on March 3 Norris Cochran, performing Secretary of Wellness and Human Company, requested for an extension till April 14, according to court docket documents.

In February, the Supreme Court docket acknowledged the AHA’s request for judicial review of an appeals court docket selection siding with HHS’s selection to minimize payments to off-campus services. 


At stake for hospitals was the reduction of an approximated $800 million in income in 2020, at a time when health methods ended up and proceed to experience financial troubles owing to the COVID-19 pandemic.

THE Greater Development

The Bipartisan Spending plan Act in 2015 licensed CMS to impose web-site-neutral payments but grandfathered present medical center outpatient services. 

In November 2019, the Facilities for Medicare and Medicaid Companies determined to transfer ahead with a two-12 months section-in of web-site-neutral payments regardless of a selection in the district court docket earlier in the 12 months siding with hospitals in their fight to maintain the bigger outpatient payments for off-campus services.

HHS appealed the selection, but in December 2019, the Facilities for Medicare and Medicaid Companies explained it would repay hospitals for cuts manufactured in web-site-neutral payments by immediately reprocessing calendar 12 months 2019 promises for medical center outpatient providers supplied in off-campus company-primarily based departments that experienced been grandfathered beneath the Bipartisan Spending plan Act of 2015. The volume was approximated at $380 million for 2019.

In July 2020, the U.S. Court docket of Appeals in the District of Columbia explained HHS experienced the authority to minimize the payments. The court docket selection meant CMS would now be spending previously grandfathered off-campus outpatient departments run by hospitals at the same lower fee as medical professional clinics.

Hospitals requested the Supreme Court docket for a judicial review, seeking to have the ruling overturned.

The major big difference concerning Medicare payments to medical center outpatient services and independent places of work has encouraged hospitals and health methods to purchase medical professional tactics, but a study has famous that excellent exploration about this has been missing up to now.

Twitter: @SusanJMorse
E-mail the writer: [email protected]